Introduction
Model-informed drug development uses dose-exposure-response models to make more informed decisions about dosing. The first element of these models is using information about drug dosages to predict drug exposure.
Dose vs. Exposure: What’s the Difference?
Dose is the amount of drug given to the patient, usually given as mass units (such as mg) or mass units by patient weight (such as mg/kg). Exposure is the amount of drug actually available in the body, usually given as concentration (such as mg/L) in blood plasma. Exposure is a closer approximation of the amount of drug that is actually active at the mechanism of action (e.g., the amount of an oncology drug acting on the tumor).
Defining Exposure Metrics
Population pharmacokinetic models, or popPK models, estimate a patient’s concentration in plasma over time, given their drug dosing schedule and covariates such as patient characteristics or concomitant medications. The concentration-time profile can be estimated even more specifically for individual patients if their drug concentration has been sampled.
Some models, such as tumor-growth inhibition models, use the concentration-time profile. Many exposure-response analyses summarize the concentration-time profile into single values such as the maximum concentration. These summary values are referred to as exposure metrics.
Exposure Metrics: From Concentration Over Time to a Single Value
Exposure in an interval
Concentration over a certain time period can be summarized as the average concentration (Cavg), the maximum concentration (Cmax), and the trough concentration (Ctrough - the minimum concentration before the next dose is administered).
In the figure below, Cmax and Ctrough during the first dosing interval are marked by the red and blue dashed lines. Cavg would be calculated by dividing the area of the blue shaded region by 12, since the length of the interval is 12 hours.
Exposure at steady-state
Exposure metrics are also commonly calculated over a dosing interval at steady state. A patient receiving repeated doses of a drug on a consistent schedule has reached steady state when the concentration-time profile in one dosing interval is the same as the previous interval, indicating that the rate of drug administration and elimination are in equilibrium.
Steady-state exposure metrics are useful because they can be meaningfully compared between different lengths of dosing intervals. It may not be possible to calculate steady-state exposure metrics in datasets with many dose modifications or irregular dosing patterns.
When timing matters: Exposure up to event time
The impact of dose modifications or irregular dosing on a certain event may be summarized by Cavg up to the event of interest.
This measure can be very informative, but can also introduce bias depending on how exactly it is formulated.
Conclusions
Multiple different exposure metrics can summarize the concentration-time profile of individual patients. The most appropriate exposure metric to explain a response may differ depending on the true underlying mechanism of action and other factors. Model development procedures can help select the best exposure metric, even if those factors are unknown.